Surprise Windfall: How Stronger SEC Oversight Benefits Global Borrowers

The University of Missouri’s Robert J. Trulaske, Sr. College of Business would like to thank the Trulaske family and Deloitte for helping to make research like this possible.


The University of Missouri’s Robert J. Trulaske, Sr. College of Business would like to thank the Trulaske family and Deloitte for helping to make research like this possible.

Securities regulation is often viewed through a narrow lens — as a constraint firms must navigate, rather than a tool they might welcome. But groundbreaking research from the University of Missouri’s Robert J. Trulaske, Sr. College of Business flips this narrative on its head. The study finds that stronger oversight by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) creates unintended yet highly beneficial spillovers — notably, cheaper and more favorable private lending terms for global firms.

Unexpected Dividends from Regulation

This counterintuitive insight stems from a detailed examination of how foreign companies cross-listed in the U.S. fared when SEC oversight expanded. Thanks to the staggered adoption of the Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding (MMoU) — a global cooperation framework spearheaded by the International Organization of Securities Commissions — the SEC gradually gained new powers over firms based abroad but listed in the U.S.

The findings come from a study co-authored by Mahfuz Chy (assistant professor), Inder Khurana (Geraldine Trulaske Chair), and Hoyoun Kyung (Deloitte Faculty Scholar), all from Trulaske’s School of Accountancy. The research team analyzed 2,729 syndicated loan agreements for 891 such cross-listed firms across 31 countries. Their goal: to isolate how increased SEC oversight affected firms' access to private capital. Published in the “Journal of Accounting Research,” their work offers new insights into how regulatory moves influence capital access beyond its intended targets.

“We expected SEC enforcement to matter in public markets,” Khurana said. “What stood out, though, was that banks, even though they aren’t directly regulated by the SEC, also appear to factor its oversight into their lending decisions. That kind of indirect effect, where rules designed for public investors influence private lenders, was a particularly notable finding.”

The Oversight Dividend: Cheaper, Longer-Term Loans

The numbers speak volumes. On average, loan interest rates fell by 36 basis points — a 22.5% drop in borrowing costs, translating to roughly $9 million in savings over a typical loan’s life. Firms also benefited from longer loan maturities and fewer financial covenants, suggesting that lenders gained confidence in borrowers under stronger SEC scrutiny. Instead of bracing for tighter constraints, firms found themselves with more operational freedom and lower costs.

Why the Spillover? Risk Reduction Through Outsourced Monitoring

What explains this unexpected upside? The researchers point to a powerful mechanism: reduced monitoring risk.

Lenders — especially sophisticated institutions — view robust SEC enforcement as a reliable proxy for financial integrity. With the SEC serving as another layer of oversight, banks may scale back some elements of their own diligence. The regulatory presence itself becomes a credibility signal, diminishing perceived risk and prompting lenders to offer better terms.

The effect was most pronounced in countries with weak domestic institutions, where SEC oversight served as a credible substitute for local enforcement gaps. It’s a vivid example of how regulation designed for one purpose can catalyze trust in entirely different markets.

When Enforcement Becomes an Economic Engine

The study also highlights four conditions that amplified the positive spillovers:

  • Institutional Weakness: Firms from countries with less effective legal systems saw the biggest cost savings.
  • SEC Resourcing: Stronger SEC budgets correlated with greater loan benefits, reinforcing the value of funding enforcement.
  • Accounting Flexibility: Firms with more discretion in financial reporting gained more. Oversight reassured lenders.
  • Lender Sophistication: Elite banks responded more quickly and aggressively to the perceived risk reduction.

Implications for Business, Policy and Governance

The broader takeaway is both surprising and empowering: Securities regulation can yield economic advantages far beyond its intended scope. For companies contemplating a U.S. cross-listing, SEC scrutiny may seem like a compliance cost. But as this study shows, it can also be a powerful catalyst for unlocking cheaper, more flexible private capital.

For policymakers, the research underscores the strategic value of cross-border regulatory cooperation and consistent enforcement funding. Far from being a bureaucratic footnote, the MMoU enabled real-world improvements in lending terms on a global scale.

“Regulators should consider the broader ripple effects of enforcement,” Hoyoun said. “Rules aimed at public companies can generate positive spillovers, like increasing banks’ confidence in lending. Recognizing those effects can lead to a more complete and accurate understanding of a regulation’s full impact.”

And for boards, investors, and executives, the findings are a timely reminder: Transparency and oversight don’t just protect against downside risk — they generate measurable financial upside.

Featured Image
adobe stock image - capital market

 

A Global Win-Win for Capital Markets

In an era when regulatory efforts are often dismissed as red tape, this research from Mizzou’s Trulaske College of Business reframes the conversation. Effective securities regulation, it turns out, isn’t just about punishment or prevention. When executed well, it fosters trust, reduces costs and aligns the interests of regulators, lenders and borrowers alike.

“This research is especially relevant for regulators and policymakers,” Khurana said. “While it’s well understood that third-party monitors like auditors play an important role in debt markets, our findings suggest the SEC may also function as a form of oversight — even if unintentionally. That broadens how we think about the value and reach of securities regulation.”

Mizzou’s Robert J. Trulaske, Sr. College of Business prepares students for success as global citizens, business leaders, scholars, innovators and entrepreneurs by providing access to transformative technologies, offering experience-centered learning opportunities and fostering an entrepreneurial mindset.